Position Statement Critique

Question: Discuss about the Position Statement Critique. Answer: By the provisions of the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA), research is essential, and the paper has drawn its position statement from this fact. In the introduction to the report, the paper intriguingly mentions how a practice that is evidence based is regularly referred to nursing students and nurses of all cadres. Furthermore, the conclusion reiterates the vitality that research carries as far as nursing profession is concerned. As a sealing point, the author laments about the limitations of realising clinical advancements related to research in nursing hence clearly stating his/her position on the topic. Therefore, in agreement, the position statement is well structured. Regarding the topic, the author does not focus on channelling funds in the coming five years to boost research. Instead, focus is put on importance of research on health care. Again, there is a minimal insistence on funding in the next five years. Majority of the paper has presented evidence of the importance of research utilisation and its outcomes to the patients. On the other hand, the author ought to have concentrated the paper on the gaps in financing, and mentioned to the reader the same point and even cited some examples like the ineffective support from Commonwealth, and State governments ("ARC Medical Research Policy | Australian Research Council", 2016). The author demonstrates the links to the standards established by the NMBA by quoting the standard 3.1 which states that nurses should always identify how research is relevant to improve health outcomes (Richardson-Tench Elliott, 2012). Additionally, standard 3.2, that nurses have to use updated directives of practice is mentioned. However, it is inconsistent for the author to say it can be assumed that findings from the study are a vital part in the provision of nursing care because, in reality, it is not an assumption but a confirmed result from previous researches. In matters research, the provided standards are insufficient as other NMBA standards can best stress the point. For instance, the author could have supplemented the two with standard 3.5 which inclines on quality improvement and standard 4.2 which embraces professional development ("Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia - Professional standards", 2016). To ensure quality evidence from articles, books, and other scholarly sources, writers have been asked to use sources that are not older than five years ago. This paper has severally used sources that are old, for instance in 2008 and 2010. Referring to Benbow 2008, he does not give a rationale of why wounds that are kept warm heal faster than those kept dry. In contrast, a more recent source provided a rationale that a wound kept warm promotes epithelialisation thus quick healing and dry wound increases cell death hence prolonged healing ("Do wounds heal faster when exposed to air? - Wound Care Society", 2015). However, the author has included some other credible sources like the NMBA and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) when talking about standardisation and the continuous professional development (CPD). The writer records that there is no evidence of any formal funding structure that supports nursing research in Australia. Going forward in the paper, he/she mentions the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) as the body that gives loans to medical practitioners, including nurses, in conducting research activities. It means that the author does not connect the flow of events in the document. The writer is supposed to have acknowledged that the funding bodies are insufficient but not to entirely rule out that the organisations are non-existent. In conclusion, the paper has mixed issues of quality, however, it is averagely rated. References ARC Medical Research Policy | Australian Research Council. (2016).Arc.gov.au. Retrieved 6 September 2016, from https://www.arc.gov.au/arc-medical-research-policy Do wounds heal faster when exposed to air? - Wound Care Society. (2015).Wound Care Society. Retrieved 6 September 2016, from https://woundcaresociety.org/do-wounds-heal-faster-when-exposed-to-air Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia - Professional standards. (2016). Nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au. Retrieved 9 September 2016, from https://www.nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Statements/Professional-standards.aspx Richardson-Tench, M. Elliott, M. (2012). Research in nursing. South Melbourne, Vic.: Cengage Learning.